|
Programs have on friendships of disabled and nondisabled children and what differences can be discovered in gender and grades.
For this research, 80 primary school children in the Seoul, Kyonggi and Inchon areas were selected in random selection and were formed into 40 Experimental and Controlled G
|
|
|
differences along demographic lines were seen in the frequency of baseball fans among Koreans 50 years or older. Statistically significant differences were found according to gender, age, occupation, available spending money, living arrangement and education level. On the other hand, no significant
|
|
|
Differences were partially found their present social stratum according to individual's background variation. In detail, the social stratum higher as they marked older ages. However, no differences were revealed in their parents' social stratum according to their background variation. The former pla
|
|
|
Gender Arrangements in Elementary Schools", in: Hartup, W. & Rubin, Z. (eds.): Relationships and Development. Hillsdale, N.J., S.167-184.
Uchida, A.(1992). “When "difference" is "dominance", A Critique of the "anti- power-based" Cultural Approach to Sex Differences”, Language in Society 21, S.547-56
|
|
|
differences in its nature, so allowances should be made and in addition that should be readjusted. 제 1 장 서론
제 1 절 연구의 목적
제 2 절 연구의 범위와 방법
1. 연구의 범위
2. 연구의 방법
제 2 장 경찰공무원 보수에 관한 이론적 고찰
|
|
|
Career Change: A Phenomenological Study, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytech. Institute and State University.
Weintraub, W. & H. Aronson, 1968, "A Survey of Patients in Classical Psychoanalysis: Some Vital Statistics," Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 146Jacques, E., 1965.&n
|
|
|
Differences That Matter, Cambridge University Press.
Bryson, Valerie(1999)., Feminist Debates, Macmillan.
L. A. Ricciardelli & R. J. Williams(1995)., "Desirable and Undesirable Gender Traits in
Three Behavioral Domains'". Sex Role. Vol. 33, Nos. 9/10, pp.637-655.
L. D. Dio & C. Saeagovi & R. Koest
|
|
|
젠더문제의 비가시화
3. 공동체주의의 방법론적 입장이 갖는 문제
3-1. 자아의 구성 요소에 관한 문제
3-2. 자아에 대한 타자의 우위성
3-3. 자아와 타자간의 차이 부정
3-4. 이방인에 대한 배제
Ⅳ. 여성주의적 공동
|
|
|
differences in emotional intelligence with age. The result seems to be due to the unique characteristics of learning style, the limitation of self-reporting method of EIT(Emotional Intelligence Test) and achievement test like IQ test.
2. There was no relationship between emotional intelligence and I
|
|
|
다원주의에 대한 자기사정의 민감성)
3. socio-demographic variability(사회학적 인구통계적 가변성)
(1) endowment and personality(타고난 자질과 그 성격)
(2) age and developmental stage(연령과 발달단계)
(3) gender(성)
(4) sexual orientation(성적 취향)
4. 요약
|
|
메뉴펼치기
